Ahead of an exciting new publication, the Project 21 black leadership network is collecting testimonials from black families about the importance of fatherhood.

“As a father, I can see the confidence in my daughters, knowing that I am here for them. It touches my heart to see them waiting for me at the door when I come home.”

— TJ, father of two daughters

“The only thing better than being a wife and spending the rest of my life with him, is watching the way he loves our son and being the dad I never had.”

— Karleana K. Williams, mother of one son

“Everything I am, he had a hand in. He taught me how to move, how to lead, how to be solid through it all. I am grateful for the lessons, the love, and the example.”

— Tino W. Smith II, honoring his father

“Having a father means a lot to me, especially as a young woman, because he has shown me an example of how a man should be. He has shaped my perspective of a black man because he’s provided a positive example of what healthy interactions look like between black men and their families. He also provides stability in a lot of aspects of my life because he’s always been there, and I know I can count on him for anything.”

— Alexis Robinson, honoring her father

“Having my dad in my life has been a blessing because he shaped me into an independent thinker and a doer. He’s always shown me the importance of standing on my word and following through, no matter what. From him, I learned that with hard work, consistency and faith, anything is possible. His example has been the foundation of how I move through life today.”

— Keosha Parker, honoring her father

After a whirlwind 2025, ambassadors with the Project 21 black leadership network are sharing their New Year’s hopes for 2026.

Marie Fischer

Marie Fischer, Project 21 Ambassador:

My hope is that those of us who are truly G‑d‑fearing will come together in genuine unity to stand firmly against hatred from every side, while lifting one another up rather than slipping into a mindset of victimhood.

I also long to see a deeper sense of unity among conservatives—where we clearly and proudly define who we are, rally around our shared values and gently but firmly set aside voices and behaviors that undermine the principled future we are working to build together.

Kendall Qualls

Kendall Qualls, Project 21 Ambassador:

As we enter the new year and mark the 250th anniversary of the greatest nation in the history of mankind, I pray that all who recognize this truth will commit themselves to preserving it, defending it and boldly educating others about the real and growing dangers we face.

The next 12 to 24 months will be decisive. If we fail to wake up now, we risk losing the very foundations of our nation. Self-proclaimed socialists and their Marxist allies represent the most serious domestic threat to America’s future. They openly reject and undermine American principles, despise free-market capitalism and show open hostility towards Jews, followers of Jesus Christ and the values that built this country.

Ayesha Kreutz

Chaplain Ayesha Kreutz, Project 21 Ambassador:

As we look toward 2026, my hope is to see truth spoken with courage and compassion, faith lived with integrity, and families strengthened as the foundation of a healthy society.

Frederick Douglass reminded us that “righteousness exalts a nation,” and I pray we recover that axiomatic moral clarity, one grounded not in power or politics, but in principle.

May we be a people who refuse complacency in the face of injustice, anchored in the teachings of Jesus Christ, who calls us to love truth, walk humbly and act justly. May the coming year raise up leaders of character and a generation prepared to steward liberty with wisdom and grace.

Michael Austin

Michael Austin, Project 21 Ambassador:

As we look toward 2026, my hope is for a renewed commitment to individual responsibility, strong families and opportunity — driven by hard work, not government dependency.

I hope the new year brings policies that expand economic freedom, protect educational choice and strengthen our communities from the ground up. Above all, I’m hopeful that Americans recommit to civic virtue, personal accountability and respect for one another.

Bishop John T. Coats II

Bishop John T. Coats, II, Project 21 Ambassador:

As we look toward 2026, my hope is for the strengthening of families and homes rooted in love, stability, faith and mutual respect. I pray for renewed commitment to our children and elders, ensuring that every family has access to opportunity, safety and support.

May 2026 be a year when communities come together to build and to pass on values that will sustain generations to come.

Mike Hill

Mike Hill, Project 21 Ambassador:

Baring some cataclysmic world event, I believe the combination of Trump’s tariffs, American artificial intelligence data centers and domestic energy production will mean an economic boom for the USA, and thus the world’s economy.

We must participate in this boom by investing in the market through some investment vehicle. An unprecedented opportunity is available for this generation and the next to come.

Emery McClendon

Emery McClendon, Project 21 Ambassador:

It is my hope that during the new year, we as Americans will somehow come together to make America a better and safer nation for everyone. We must work together to abolish both the external and internal threats to our freedom and liberty. America must continue to lead the world, and work toward inspiring other nations to seek justice and hope for the future. Our elected representatives must lead the way for such an effort to succeed. Our continued success depends on what we do to preserve our relationship with one another and the world.

Casey Lartigue, Jr., Project 21 Ambassador and Chairman of Freedom Speakers International (FSI):

I now live in South Korea, where I work closely with North Korean refugees who have risked everything to speak honestly about life under a closed regime.

In 2026, I’m determined to elevate their voices in public discussion as the most credible witnesses to what dictatorship actually costs. Their experiences offer Americans lessons about what we risk losing when we take freedom for granted.

 

Berney Flowers

Berney Flowers, Project 21 Ambassador: 

My hopes for the New Year:

– More peace of mind and commonsense for America and the world

– More economic success for working families everywhere

– A safer world with fewer conflicts and more cooperation

Linda Lee Tarver

Dr. Linda Lee Tarver, Project 21 Ambassador:

“Hope” in scriptures is a confident expectation in God and His Word that creates an anchor for the soul. In 2024, my hope and prayers were in a favorable election that would produce God-honoring policies and culture. Hope was fulfilled Jan. 20, 2025.

In 2026, I am hopeful the Lord will allow the seeds planted in 2025 (new policies, deportations, DOGE cuts, Christ culture, fair laws, favorable and constitutional judicial decisions, tariffs and global investments) to grow and reap a great harvest during our semiquincentennial.

Bill Cleveland

Bill Cleveland, Project 21 Ambassador:

It is my hope that America has the greatest comeback in this next year.

All that the president has done has been put in place by his cabinet, and all their super hard work is getting this nation back on its feet.

American kids today are not OK. Declining test scores, depressing headlines and worrisome anecdotes all serve as evidence that the post-pandemic, unaccountable, morally confused, discipline-absent nature of our nation’s public school systems is churning out a mess of issues for our most vulnerable young people.

In a private call today for Project 21 ambassadors, investigative journalist Chris Pabst shared insights from his book “Failure Factory: How Baltimore City Public Schools Deprive Taxpayers and Students of a Future.” Spurred by his findings, our ambassadors shared with each other what they’ve observed in their own states and communities.

Our Project 21 ambassadors come from a variety of backgrounds and career paths, and we asked a few of our education experts to weigh in on what works and what doesn’t work when it comes to educating our next generation.

Jovani Patterson

Jovani Patterson, Project 21 ambassador and an education activist in the Baltimore area:

Based on my observations as a parent, no funding formula, teacher demographic requirement or diversity quota reliably produces success in public education. What consistently makes the difference is clear, shared responsibility among parents, teachers and schools, with parents recognized as the key partners.

When my daughter attended public school, I reached out to her teacher for clarity on a specific math instructional strategy to reinforce the learning at home. The teacher’s response — essentially “Don’t worry about it, I’ll handle it at school” — was revealing. It reflected a mindset in which parents are seen as optional or even obstacles rather than integrated partners in the education process.

By contrast, when we moved our children to private schools, parental involvement was expected. Parent-teacher conferences were mandatory, and families were integrated into the life of the school through events, projects and shared responsibility. This culture reinforced a simple truth: Education works best when everyone is accountable and engaged.

Urban education faces real challenges, but another decisive factor I have observed is expectations. When children are held to high academic standards, paired with belief and reinforcement, they rise to meet them.

I am seeing this firsthand with my son. When we moved and transitioned him from a strong private school into a high-performing public school system, his reading levels didn’t stall—they continued to accelerate! That success wasn’t tied to the type of school, but to the culture surrounding it. In both environments, his teachers welcomed parental involvement, communicated consistently and held clear, high expectations. There was never a suggestion that education belonged solely to the school. Instead, everyone understood it was a shared responsibility, and because of that alignment, my son continues to thrive.

In communities like Baltimore, the prevailing “whole child” framework has inadvertently shifted responsibility almost entirely onto schools, often under the rationale of justifying increased funding. While schools play an important role, their core mission should not be to replace parents, caregivers, churches or community institutions. They should focus instead on setting high academic expectations, communicating transparently with families and reinforcing a culture of responsibility and excellence.

A structural and cultural shift back toward shared responsibility is necessary, especially in urban districts. History proves what is possible: Ben Carson’s mother, despite being illiterate, raised a brain surgeon by instilling discipline, expectation and belief. Success is not determined by zip code or funding levels; it is determined by responsibility, expectations and follow-through.

Reform efforts should be focused on reinforcing this shared accountability.

Priscilla Rahn

Priscilla Rahn, Project 21 ambassador, Denver-area educator and the author and host of “Restoring Education in America“:

Education is not a system to be managed from afar; it is a calling rooted in truth, virtue and responsibility. As a Christian and a conservative, I believe Classical Education works because it begins with what is eternal—teaching children how to think, not what to think, grounding them in faith, reason and moral clarity.

Fortunately, in the past five years I have watched parents step back into their God-given roles as the primary educators, mentors and protectors of their children’s hearts and minds. They tell stories of schools that have rediscovered order, discipline and a love of learning through the trivium, and of families that have flourished when dads became visible, engaged and unapologetically present. They also expose hard truths about schools that chase social trends instead of truth, that lower standards in the name of equity and that push parents—especially fathers—to the margins.

What works is partnership, high expectations, classical content and a culture that honors faith, family, self-reliance and responsibility. What doesn’t work is bureaucracy replacing wisdom, and ideology replacing education.

If we are serious about restoring education in America—especially in our urban communities—we must be honest, courageous and solutions-oriented. Successful models already exist: classical charter schools, faith-based schools, homeschooling networks and community-driven education initiatives that empower parents and teachers rather than federal agencies.

While reducing federal overreach is part of the solution, it is not the whole story. Renewal begins at the local level—with families, churches, mentors and—yes—fathers who lead by example. It means lifting up schools that prioritize character alongside academics, that teach Western civilization without apology and that believe every child is capable of excellence. Transformation is possible when we return to first principles: faith in God, respect for the traditional family and an unwavering commitment to truth. That is how we restore education—not just for a generation, but for the future of our nation.

Melanie Collette

Melanie Collette, Project 21 ambassador and former New Jersey educator:

As a former public school teacher and adjunct professor, I witnessed firsthand how the system often fails both students and educators—not because of a lack of resources, but because of misplaced priorities and a culture that rewards mediocrity. Too many schools prioritize bureaucracy, politics and social engineering over academic mastery and personal responsibility. Teachers who expect excellence are often discouraged in the name of compliance or equity.

What truly works are schools that return to the basics—rigorous instruction, discipline and a partnership between parents and educators. Faith-based schools, schools rooted in classical education and charter schools that emphasize content-rich curricula and moral development are producing far better outcomes.

Unfortunately, many charter schools that rely heavily on public funding have fallen into the same ideological and bureaucratic traps as traditional public schools. Expanding genuine school choice through vouchers, education savings accounts and support for independent models empowers families to choose what’s best for their children.

To truly improve education, we must restore merit, reinforce local control and allow parents—not Washington—to decide how and where their kids are educated.

Linda Lee Tarver

Linda Lee Tarver, Project 21 ambassador and educational advocate based in Michigan:

Lawmakers in Michigan have significantly boosted K-12 spending in the last decade, but test scores in math and reading have significantly declined, with the state falling to the bottom 10 nationally for student performance.

Michigan’s K-12 education system faces significant challenges, with declining student achievement despite increased funding, poor rankings nationally in reading/math proficiency, low college readiness (around 25%), persistent achievement gaps for minority and low-income students, lagging national test scores, and pandemic learning loss. As a result, new state budgets are focusing on literacy, meals and career tech, while business and education leaders push for systemic improvements to better prepare students for the workforce.

For black students, education has been elusive. In 2016, black students in Detroit, represented by seven student plaintiffs, sued the state of Michigan, alleging they were denied their constitutional right to literacy due to crumbling schools, lack of books, unqualified teachers and poor conditions, leading to inadequate reading skills, a case that became known as the “right to read” lawsuit.

A federal appeals court ruled in 2020 that basic literacy is a constitutional right, eventually leading to a settlement in 2020 with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer that required millions to be spent for literacy programs but that failed to establish a nationwide precedent for a fundamental right to education.

Even though these Michigan students sued and won the right to read, however, leftist state leaders have continued to decimate education and accountability. They have eliminated merit pay for teachers, boosted teacher unions, expanded mental health for students bullied for gender identity, prioritized LGBTQ+ in-class awareness campaigns, permitted Black Lives Matter and gay pride flags in schools, focused on social-emotional learning and social transitioning (aka name changes) during school hours, permitted males in female sports and private spaces, and coerced pronoun compliance.

As a result of these liberal policies, Michigan’s rank recently dropped from 14th to 36th in math and 20th to 42nd in reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), landing a tragic 44th overall for student performance in 2025, down from 32nd overall in 2015.

Leftists have a torrid history in keeping blacks illiterate. Southern states, including South Carolina (1740), Virginia (1819), Georgia (1829), Louisiana (1830), North Carolina (1830), Alabama (1832) and Missouri (1847), enacted harsh anti-literacy laws that criminalized teaching enslaved and free black people to read or write, punishing offenders with fines, imprisonment, floggings or worse due to fears that literacy would incite rebellion and challenge the slave system.

But there is hope! We serve a God who sits high and looks low and hears the prayers of His people. And classical education! Classical education isn’t a cure for all illiteracy, but its structured, phonics-based approach and focus on foundational language skills (grammar, rhetoric) are highly effective for teaching how to read and write, building strong literacy foundations and fostering critical thinking, making it a powerful tool against foundational illiteracy, especially when integrated with modern needs and adaptations for diverse learners.

Smaller classrooms realigned back to the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic are essential. We live a free society, and children of all backgrounds, races and religions deserve a quality education and literacy.

“Black conservatives at Howard Divinity face a painful choice: compromise core biblical convictions or endure professional sabotage and social exile.”

In a commentary posted at The BLEXIT Pulse, Project 21 Ambassador Charisma Peoples opens up about the disappointment, disillusionment and marginalization she’s experienced at Howard because of her conservative beliefs.

She writes:

A divinity school should be where Scripture is honored above ideology, where diverse perspectives sharpen rather than destroy each other, and where students are evaluated on their faithfulness to God’s Word—not their allegiance to progressive politics.”

Read her courageous testimony below.

I came to Howard University School of Divinity expecting to deepen my faith and sharpen my theological understanding. Instead, I found myself targeted, isolated, and persecuted—not for any moral failing, but for holding conservative Christian beliefs while Black.

Charisma Peoples

The persecution began subtly but escalated under Dean Kenyatta Gilbert’s leadership into a coordinated campaign of harassment. When I expressed support for conservative principles, I became a pariah. Every scholarship I applied for was denied. Every conference opportunity I sought was rejected. The pattern was unmistakable—my academic qualifications hadn’t changed, but my political and theological views had become disqualifying. Students openly mocked me. Faculty created classroom environments so hostile that expressing biblical views invited ridicule and retaliation. When Charlie Kirk passed away, some students cruelly mocked his death—a display of callousness that revealed the depths of their ideological capture.

What I’ve witnessed at Howard Divinity exposes a disturbing trend: Black liberals weaponizing the legitimate struggles of our community as a Trojan horse for progressive ideology that contradicts Scripture itself. They invoke the pain of slavery, Jim Crow, and ongoing injustice—real struggles deserving recognition—but then smuggle in teachings fundamentally incompatible with Christianity. Disagree, and you’re not just wrong; you’re a traitor to your race.

The theological drift is alarming. Professors who are ordained ministers openly teach that Jesus Christ is not the exclusive path to God, directly contradicting John 14:6. They reframe biblical villains like Jezebel as liberators. At Opening Convocation 2023, Dean Gilbert boasted that his “third eye was aligned”—language rooted in New Age mysticism and Eastern spirituality, not Christian orthodoxy. The school actively promotes practices like Hoodoo, veneration of Orishas, ancestor worship, and Ancient Kemet spirituality, presenting them as compatible with—or even enriching to—Christian faith.

This isn’t theological diversity; it’s syncretism that violates the First Commandment. Yet questioning these practices is treated as evidence of colonized thinking rather than biblical fidelity.

Scripture warned us: “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons” (1 Timothy 4:1). False prophets don’t always announce themselves. Sometimes they wear academic robes and speak in liberation’s language while leading people away from Christ.

Black conservatives at Howard Divinity face a painful choice: compromise core biblical convictions or endure professional sabotage and social exile. This shouldn’t be the price of theological education. A divinity school should be where Scripture is honored above ideology, where diverse perspectives sharpen rather than destroy each other, and where students are evaluated on their faithfulness to God’s Word—not their allegiance to progressive politics.

The Black church has survived slavery, segregation, and systemic racism by anchoring itself in the unchanging truth of Scripture. We must not allow that foundation to be eroded by those who use our community’s suffering to justify abandoning biblical truth. Our ancestors didn’t endure the Middle Passage so their descendants could be taught that all roads lead to God and Jesus is just one option among many.

Howard University School of Divinity must decide: Will it be a school that trains faithful ministers of the Gospel, or an institution that produces social activists with theological degrees? Right now, it’s failing those of us who came seeking the former and found only the latter—along with persecution for refusing to conform.

Project 21 Ambassador Charisma Peoples is a Christian conservative writer and contributor who is working on her Masters in Divinity at Howard University. This was first published at The BLEXIT Pulse.

Corporations that aren’t basing their ESG/DEI investments on traditional return on investment (ROI) calculations risk being held legally accountable for numerous infractions, warns Free Enterprise Project (FEP) Executive Director Stefan Padfield in a commentary published at RealClearMarkets.

FEP has been filing numerous shareholder proposals this season tackling this issue, and Stefan reports that “the optics for implicated corporations are not good so far.”

Read Stefan’s commentary below.

There are myriad red flags that corporations have been investing in ESG, which includes DEI, without properly assessing net present value (NPV) or return on investment (ROI), even though NPV and ROI calculations should be the starting point for any corporate decision-making. For example, an article in the Harvard Business Review noted a few years ago that “before anyone writes a check, you need to calculate the return on investment (ROI) by comparing the expected benefits with the costs.”

Stefan Padfield

Importantly, if corporations do not base their ESG and DEI investments on traditional NPV and ROI calculations, they have the potential to be held accountable for numerous infractions, including breach of duty of care, breach of duty of loyalty, breach of duty of oversight, breach of duty of candor, securities fraud and consumer fraud. Let’s unpack that.

First, corporate managers have a fiduciary duty to make fully informed decisions, and it is arguably impossible to defend a corporate decision as fully informed if there was not even an attempt to assess NPV or ROI. And the signs that this omission is rampant are everywhere. Read almost any corporate ESG report and there will likely be no mention of ROI. Of course, there are decisions that can’t be boiled down to NPV or ROI. But even in those cases, corporations should be clear about how they concluded NPV and ROI analysis was impossible or too costly.

Second, there are good reasons to believe that if NPV and ROI assessments were made, they would not support the ESG/DEI initiatives. For example, Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance at London Business School, has noted that: “There is no link between demographic diversity and performance, despite many flimsy reports claiming the contrary…. Indeed, the evidence is that quota-driven demographic diversity reduces performance.” (Not to mention setting corporations up for million-dollar discrimination claims.) Meanwhile, net zero commitments may be utterly utopian.

Third, if corporate managers are consciously disregarding their duty to make fully informed decisions when it comes to adopting ESG and DEI initiatives, then they are arguably not only breaching the duty of care that governs information gathering but also acting in bad faith. A breach of the duty of good faith is much more serious than a breach of the duty of care. This is so because breaches of the duty of care can often be immunized or insured while the bad faith conduct typically cannot be similarly protected. And this still leaves potential breaches of the duty of oversight and candor, the former being specifically targeted at the board of directors.

Fourth, a failure to properly inform ESG and DEI decision-making not only implicates corporate law breaches of duty, but also potentially violations of federal securities law disclosure regimes as well as consumer fraud laws. Specifically, if corporate talking heads are walking around assuring investors and consumers that the company’s ESG and DEI initiatives are good for business, they must have a good basis for so concluding or else may be found to have been misleading listeners.

Fifth, all this also implicates the Big 5 asset managers and proxy advisors. If they are pushing corporations to adopt ESG and DEI initiatives (see here and here) without the proper underlying financial analysis, then they may also be liable for breaching duties to their shareholders, or misleading their clients, or even engaging in a conspiracy to defraud others in an effort to boost profits derived from selling ESG funds and ESG consulting services.

All the foregoing explains why this shareholder proposal season my employer, the National Center for Public Policy Research, where I work as the Executive Director of the Free Enterprise Project, plans to file numerous proposals asking or requiring corporations to come clean on the extent to which they have based their ESG and DEI initiatives on NPV and ROI. Without naming names, I can tell you that this process has already begun and the optics for implicated corporations are not good so far. One corporation’s proposed response to our DEI ROI proposal could not even manage to reference ROI in its opposition, preferring instead to handwave the endless empty platitudes we’ve grown so used to hearing in defense of DEI.

So, rest assured, the ESG ROI reckoning is coming.